Business Plans
Grant Proposals
Fundraising

Home • Fiction Writing Tips • 2008-05-15 A tough job

Search • Printer Friendly Version

• Fiction Writing Tips Homepage

• 2008-11-25 Why do readers seem to know more?
• 2011-10-05 Starting Again
• 2009-08-23 - Rewriting a manuscript
• 2009-02-04 Why Ross is out of favour
• 2008-06-15 A wonderful book
• 2008-05-15 A tough job
• Rewrite Man
• 2008-12-21 Location, location
• 2008-10-16 Second printing
• First Lines
• Little Changes with Big Impact
• How did they know?
• Oh, Niki, you're so fine
• Keep it short, and sweeter
• An intended consequence
• What if it all stinks?
• Working without an agent
• 48,710 words
• 37,047 words
• Staying at it - 2008-01-16
• Writing a new book - 2007-12-30
• MacDonald vs. McDonald - 2007-12-15
• Being seen in Toronto - 2007-09-27
• Where ideas come from - 2007-08-17
• Starting over - 2007-08-14
• Writing like Elmore? - 2007-08-01
• The future of crime writing? - 2007-07-15
• Is Body Contact subverting a tradition? - 2007-06-15
• Do writers have a life? - 2007-06-12
• Begin with an ending in mind - 2007-06-01

A tough job
Posted May 15, 2008
I'm having a look at, and reading if possible, all the contenders for best novel in the Arthur Ellis Awards sponsored by the Crime Writers of Canada.

Here's what's on the list:

- 1 cozy set in a Quebec village
- 1 suburban thriller
- 1 19th century book set in Toronto, involving slavery
- 1 19th century book set in London, England
- 1 contemporary mystery set in a small Canadian city

With that range, does a judge actually try to determine the best novel? Or throw five names in the air and grab one?